Migrate off a legacy core without going dark.
Reference architecture for an existing bank moving off a legacy core, or an SME switching primary banking relationship. Klyqo runs a parallel runtime above both cores, gradually shifts journeys, migrates standing orders + direct debits + balance, zero-downtime cutover. Built for institutions that can’t take a weekend offline.
The hardest banking project: change the engine while flying.
Core migration is the most expensive, highest-risk project a bank ever runs. Most attempts go over budget or get reversed. The reason is that incumbents treat it as a big-bang — weekend cutover, hold your breath, hope. Klyqo’s shape supports the opposite: parallel run, journey-by-journey migration, gradual ownership shift.
Two cores. One runtime. Gradual ownership shift.
Klyqo sits above both the legacy core and the target core during the migration window. Journeys read + write to one or both depending on configuration. The migration is journey-by-journey: KYC first, accounts next, payments after, until every journey runs against the target. The legacy core dims gradually instead of being switched off.
Each journey migrates on its own schedule.
Migration runs as a per-journey project. KYC migrates first (low risk, high learning). Accounts next (medium risk). Payments after (highest risk, last). Each journey’s migration window is a few weeks of parallel run plus a per-journey cutover. The customer sees nothing change.
What you pick from the marketplace.
A bank-switch project mostly preserves the existing provider stack. The marketplace work is the adapter to the new core and the reconciliation tooling.
Honest about the build.
Core migration projects fail more often than they succeed. The failures aren’t about technology — they’re about scope creep, executive impatience for a big-bang cutover, and reconciliation discipline that erodes over a 12-month window. Klyqo’s shape encourages the opposite: small migration units (per-journey), continuous reconciliation, no big-bang. The discipline still has to come from your team.
What you bring: the existing banking licence, the legacy core access, the project sponsorship, the operations team. What Klyqo brings: the parallel-run runtime, the adapter to the legacy core, the journey migration cadence, the reconciliation tooling, the audit trail per journey. What we figure out together: which journey first (almost always KYC or onboarding), what the cutover criteria look like per journey, what the regulator engagement cadence is.
If you’re a bank planning a core migration and you don’t want to learn the big-bang lesson the way most banks before you did: talk to us before you sign with a tier-1 integrator who’ll quote you 18 months and a weekend cutover.
Considering a core migration?
If you’re a bank planning to leave a legacy core and you want a parallel-run, journey-by-journey migration shape instead of a big-bang, the first conversation is short. Tell us about the legacy core, the target, the timeline, the executive sponsorship. We’ll tell you honestly what a 6 to 12 month Klyqo-shaped migration looks like.
Email diogo@klyqo.com Response within two business days